The 2012 Tax Debate

Traveling stars
Creative Commons License photo credit: ` TheDreamSky 꿈꾸는 하늘

“Bright star, would I were steadfast as thou art.”  John Keats

Another two year patch.  By a lame duck Congress.  That is what  Obama’s tax deal is.  The proposal which has now passed the Senate and is currently before the House is posed to follow the patch of the past ten years known as the Bush tax cuts, or EGTRRA, which were passed in 2001. 

Former Republican Presidential candidate Mitt Romney opposes the current bill because there is a need for greater certainty in the tax laws.  After two years, if Congress does not act again, the tax rates will revert to the levels they were at in 2001, a big jump.  Romney argues that the benefit of keeping taxes low is lost because investors cannot predict if taxes will still be low after two years and therefore the lower taxes do not provide any real incentive to long-term investing. Instead, the next patch will be determined in a Presidential election year, perhaps by another lame duck Congress.  Few things can be more uncertain than what will happen then.

Romney Rolls Though Polk, Iowa
Creative Commons License photo credit: WEBN-TV

The author of the popular Tax Girl blog takes an opposite approach to uncertainty.  The pressing need for short term certainty outweighs all other considerations, even her own scruples that the Bush tax cuts are too low.  Once this stop-gap is passed, she reasons, then there will be time to carefully craft a long-term tax plan. 

This is an urgent matter, true, but it is only urgent because it has not been dealt with in the past ten years.  It is hard to see how the next two years will be any different.

Someone first came up with the idea to make the 2001 tax cuts temporary.  In a way, this was illusory.  Because Congress can change the tax laws at any time.  All laws passed by Congress are temporary and always have been.

Making the latest proposal good for only two years merely increases the chances that the issue will next be dealt with by another lame duck Congress, after a Presidential election, in 2012.  Is that the right time to next be dealing with this?  Probably not.

Until then, let’s do our tax and estate planning the same as always, knowing that change is the only thing we can count on.

King of The Castle..:O)
Creative Commons License photo credit: law_keven

This entry was posted in Congress, Estate Planning, Federal Estate Taxes and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to The 2012 Tax Debate

  1. Wow, superb blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you made blogging look easy. The overall look of your web site is great, as well as the content!

  2. I conceive you have noted some very interesting points , thanks for the post. – I don’t have to attend every argument I’m invited to. W.C.Filelds 1880

  3. Kandi Amoros says:

    Wohh just what I was looking for, thankyou for posting . – If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a man and a dog. Mark Twain 1835 1910

  4. neem says:

    I love ur blog articles! Hold on, u are very good.

    Tree Neem

  5. case mod pc says:

    terrific information, I’m going to return when i am not so worn out! Just book marked it.

  6. What’s up, just wanted to tell you, I loved this post. It was practical. Keep on posting!||

Comments are closed.